Method kit

The methodological basics of qualitative (social) research are presented by colleagues for colleagues. The aim of the format is to give the presenter the opportunity to familiarise themselves more intensively with a methodological topic and to exchange ideas with colleagues, while at the same time offering participants the option of refreshing or deepening their methodological knowledge.
As a rule, a researcher/young scientist presents the content of a topic, followed by a discussion. The form in which the topic is presented (e.g. PowerPoint, bringing along data material, visualisation in analysis software, etc.) can be decided by the presenter.

Who can take part?
All researchers (with or without a university affiliation) who would like to expand or deepen their knowledge of methodological principles and exchange ideas on methodological content


When and where does the method case take place?
The method case takes place quarterly on Mondays from 3-5 pm. As the method case thrives on the exchange between participants, the event takes place in person (Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Haus 92a, conference room 2.0G).

Address: Reisensburger Straße 30; 89312 Günzburg
To Google Maps

 

Dates

29.01.2023: Formation of typologies (Prof. Dr phil. Silvia Krumm, Head of the AG Qualitative Social Research, M. A. Sociology & Dr phil. Yamara Wessling, M. A. Ethnology)

09.10.2023: Fears in qualitative studies: What can go wrong and how to deal with it? (Exchange and discussion forum)

17.07.2023: Reporting and publishing qualitative data (COREQ guidelines, journal selection) (Lea Mayer, M.Sc. Psychology)

20.03.2023: Working and visualising with MAXQDA (Gironimo Krieg, M.A. Sociology)

23.01.2023: atlas.ti (Tim Pössnecker, Dipl. Psych.)

07.11.2022: Integrative basic procedure (Gironimo Krieg, M.A. Sociology)

Participation

If you are interested in participating in the method kit or would like to present your own topic, please contact Lea Mayer.

 

Mailing list

Information about the next dates, the next topics and any short-term information about the method kit (meeting point, cases of illness, etc.) is regularly communicated via the mailing list. To subscribe or unsubscribe from the mailing list, simply send a short message to Lea Mayer. Mails from the QFW may also be forwarded to interested parties.

 

Archive

Here you will find suitable literature on the previous topics of the method kit.

Friese, S. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.14279/depositonce-5155

Friese, S. (2016). computer-assisted grounded theory analysis with ATLAS.ti. doi: 10.4135/9781529799590

Video tutorials from atlas.ti

Basics

Kruse, J., & Schmieder, C. (2014). Qualitative interview research. Beltz Juventa.

Podcast Methodenkoffer, episode 21 on Youtube

 

Application examples - health services research

Geukes, C. (2019). Health Literacy and the Construction of Health and Illness from the Perspective of Older People with Intellectual Disabilities. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 20(2), Art. 4. doi: 10.17169/fqs-20.2.3001.

Vetter, M. (2015). School-based therapies and inclusive education: in the field of tension between institutionally defined responsibility and subjective experience of problems and effectiveness with consequences for interventions. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), Art. 14. doi: 10.17169/fqs-16.3.2277.

 

Application examples - social sciences

Eckert, J., Bub, E., & Koppetsch, C. (2019). Talking about break-ups: on the milieu-specificity of separation legitimisations and narrative identities. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 20(1), Art. 14. doi: 10.17169/fqs-20.1.3078.

Gröschner, C. (2021). needs-based allocation of resources? A Qualitative Study on Dealing with Social Inequality in Primary School Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Lipkina, J. (2017). The empirical exploration of educational processes in biographical material using the integrative basic procedure. ZQF , 18(1), 137-152. doi: 10.3224/zqf.v18i1.10.

Luft, L. (2022). Of "diligent worker bees", "soul comforters", "surrogate mums" and revolutionaries. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Schulz, M. (2020). The time of reading. Reconstruction of aestheticised own times and the question of time direction in (audio) text appropriation. Forum Qualitative Social Research,21(2), Art. 1. doi: 10.17169/fqs-21.2.3247.

 

Supplementary methods

Bethman, S., Helfferich, C., Hoffmann, H., & Niermann, D.(2012). Agency. Qualitative reconstructions and socio-theoretical references of agency. Beltz Juventa.

Helfferich, C. (2004). Gender positioning in group discussions. In: Buchen, S., Helfferich, C., Maier, M.S. (eds.) Gender methodologisch. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Keller, R. (2008). Analysing discourses and dispositives. Sociological discourse analysis as a contribution to a knowledge-analytical profiling of discourse research. Historische Sozialforschung, 33(1), 73-107. doi:10.12759/hsr.33.2008.1.73-107.

Keller, R.(2011). Handbook of social science discourse analysis. VS Verlag for Social Sciences.

Lucius-Hoene, G. & Deppermann, A. (2013). Reconstructing narrative identity. A workbook for analysing narrative interviews. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften GmbH.

Website of Cornelia Helfferich

 

Buus, N., & Perron, A. (2020). The quality of quality criteria: Replicating the development of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). International journal of nursing studies, 102, 103452. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103452

De Jong, Y., van der Willik, E. M., Milders, J., Voorend, C. G. N., Morton, R. L., Dekker, F. W., ... & van Diepen, M. (2021). A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ-and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake. BMC medical research methodology, 21, 1-11. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01363-1

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International journal for quality in health care, 19(6), 349-357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

 

Further information and contact person

If you have any questions about the method kit or would like to present something in the method kit yourself, please contact us directly.

Profilbild von  Lea Mayer

Lea Mayer

M. Sc. in Psychologie | wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin und Doktorandin